Nitwit Nation: Is America Too Dumb for Democracy?
by: Dan Nerhaugen
Most Americans are enthusiastic supporters of their own civic
rights, but few bother to meet any would-be democrat's (or any
would-be republican's, if you prefer) number-one responsibility:
that of keeping oneself sufficiently literate and well informed
to be able to vote rationally and knowledgeably. Mountains of
too-long ignored evidence show that the vast majority of our nation's
citizens cannot possibly meet that responsibility -- that their
functional literacies are so limited that our form of government
can't accurately be called a "democracy." The word,
rather, is "ochlocracy": government based on the uninformed
passions and whims of the mob.
In 1988, the United States Congress mandated a massive study
on adult literacy in America. Some of the nation's most highly
esteemed testing and evaluation specialists fanned out across
the country, interviewing and testing literally thousands of citizens,
young and old, rich and poor, educated and not. The result, published
in 1993 as "Adult Literacy in America," showed that
at least 96 percent of America's adults were unlikely to be able
to perform tasks that one might think preposterously simple. Specifically,
the study showed that only tiny percentages of us can dependably
do such things as (1) read and demonstrate basic comprehension
of a 1-page juror information sheet; (2) peruse and explain essential
elements presented on a 1-page printed table such as one might
receive at a school board meeting; or (3) explain how to solve
a simple consumer arithmetic problem.
Subsequent studies (such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development 's "Literacy in the Information Age,"
published in 2000), tend to confirm the general impression one
is left with after a close reading of "Adult Literacy in
America": that we as a people simply don't have the kinds
of tool knowledge and basic skills necessary to sustain any democracy
worthy of the name. In other words, as citizens, the vast majority
of Americans are functionally illiterate.
"If you don't use it, you lose it," the saying goes,
and that's a major reason we've come to this sorry pass: we're
too busy doing other things to keep our minds from atrophying
-- and one of those "other things" overshadows all the
rest as our most villainous time thief. Let's do a little arithmetic.
From the 24-hour day we all start with, we'll subtract seven hours
for the abbreviated night's sleep that most of us get. Our workdays
may be eight hours in theory, but they often go longer, and then
there's the commute, work-related errands, etc., so subtract another
nine hours. A day's meals, personal hygiene, and household chores
will consume about two more hours -- more if meals (including
preparation, consumption, and cleanup) are permitted to last longer
than 30 minutes each. A million other unpredictables (answering
emails or phone calls from friends or family, soccer practice,
car problems, surfing the Net, card club, a talkative neighbor
-- whatever) will inevitably conspire to relieve us of a couple
more. That leaves about four available hours per weekday, give
or take.
Care to guess how much TV Americans watch, on average, every
day? Could it be ... four hours? Yep. In 1961, FCC Chairman Newton
Minnow famously called TV a "vast wasteland." Maybe
it was, maybe it is, maybe not. But let's leave questions of quality
aside for the moment. Whether one's TV viewing choices are ridiculous
or sublime, the arithmetic is the same: the vast quantity of television
Americans watch leaves virtually no time (at least during the
workweek) for anything else -- no time to read, write, or cipher
anything unrelated to our jobs or maybe a favorite hobby or two.
And so we become a nitwit nation, with most of uts citizens comfortable
operating within their own little worlds of work, family, TV,
familiar social activities, and errands, but self-deprived of
the time necessary to practice the art of thinking and acting
like a citizen.
One wonders what our republic might be like if its constituents
suddenly saw fit to struggle by on only, say, three hours of TV
time per day, and gave the remaining hour to something more enlightening.
If the unthinkable were to happen and we were to disengage from
our tubes once in awhile, how might we best hone and exercise
the essential skills we need to cast responsible ballots?
How about reading some mind-stretching books? Those who like
to sentimentalize books in general tend to gush naive nonsense,
and the old saying that it doesn't matter what you read as long
as you read something is the purest idiocy. It couldn't possibly
matter more. Americans are tremendous buyers and readers of books
(on weekends, perhaps) but the dominant varieties are genre fiction
and self-help books. Those may be fine for what they are, but
how they'll strengthen the Union -- or their readers' basic literacies
-- is beyond me.
So what "should" a citizen of the republic be reading?
A little bit of everything -- because in a democracy, one needs
to know at least a little bit about pretty much everything. We
need to read that which might make us more mentally agile and
better informed about our world, be it works of science, history,
economics, quality literature ... the choices are endless, and
we need to say yes to as many of them as possible, as often as
we possibly can. In a democracy, functional literacy demands promiscuous
reading, including but certainly not limited to books.
Apart from the fact that books can disseminate essential information
(which TV or the Net can, arguably, do more efficiently), there's
another aspect of reading them that makes our doing so essential
to the health of the republic. Reading well-written books, unlike
watching most TV shows or cruising through a succession of websites,
demands sustained and nuanced thought. It's easy to spend countless
hours in front of the television or on the Internet without ever
having to examine an idea of any consequence for more than a few
seconds, if at all. When democracy's working its hardest and best,
it's a deeply involved and profoundly complicated enterprise.
It requires that its practitioners focus on vexing problems, see
many sides and shadings of a given question, and a find creative
and satisfying solutions: precisely the kinds of mental processes
one is led through over the course of most well-crafted, demanding
books. Reading worthwhile books is a form of democratic calisthenics
for the mind.
Simply turning off our TVs and reading the best books we can
find won't necessarily strengthen the republic or heal the world.
But it couldn't hurt, and our continued failure to do so is causing
incalculable harm. Democracy may be what we want, but until we
as a people acquire the habit of stretching our minds a whole
lot further than we presently do, ochlocracy is most assuredly
what we shall have.
About The Author: Dan Nerhaugen is a freelance writer and
Web designer who in other lives has also been a stockbroker, English
teacher, journalist and editor. Since 1999 he's produced and sold
over 5,000 articles to more than 50 Upper Midwestern newspapers,
for three of which he served as managing editor. He maintains
the website the48er.com,
featuring books, DVDs, and more for liberals and progressives.
|